We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Smaller fees use.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion includes a transfer to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, delivers financial relief by putting an employee in a higher pay scale, without switching their task duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same shell out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they deficiency prospects for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Instrument used to reduce the hardship of long-term stagnation. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it can be unclear the way it relates to any presented situation, usually rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case at hand. These kinds of decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
ten. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, this kind of yearly increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to generally be made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the law laid down from the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority in the parent department from the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority with the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided with the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
eight. With the reasons stated higher than, this court finds the petition to be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more
States also typically have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family legislation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the check here body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending over the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case legislation might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for that Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one particular district court in Ny just isn't binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more